Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 56
Filtrar
Más filtros

Medicinas Complementárias
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 3: CD008591, 2021 03 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33661528

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Seasonal affective disorder (SAD) is a seasonal pattern of recurrent depressive episodes that is often treated with second-generation antidepressants (SGAs), light therapy, or psychotherapy. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of second-generation antidepressants (SGAs) for the treatment of seasonal affective disorder (SAD) in adults in comparison with placebo, light therapy, other SGAs, or psychotherapy. SEARCH METHODS: This is an update of an earlier review first published in 2011. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2020, Issue 1) in the Cochrane Library (all years), Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO (2011 to January 2020), together with the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Controlled Trials Register (CCMDCTR) (all available years), for reports of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We hand searched the reference lists of all included studies and other systematic reviews. We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for unpublished/ongoing trials. We ran a separate update search for reports of adverse events in the Ovid databases.  SELECTION CRITERIA: For efficacy we included RCTs of SGAs compared with other SGAs, placebo, light therapy, or psychotherapy in adult participants with SAD. For adverse events we also included non-randomised studies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened abstracts and full-text publications against the inclusion criteria. Data extraction and 'Risk of bias' assessment were conducted individually. We pooled data for meta-analysis where the participant groups were similar, and the studies assessed the same treatments with the same comparator and had similar definitions of outcome measures over a similar duration of treatment. MAIN RESULTS: In this update we identified no new RCT on the effectiveness of SGAs in SAD patients. We included 2 additional single-arm observational studies that reported on adverse events of SGAs.  For efficacy we included three RCTs of between five and eight weeks' duration with a total of 204 participants. For adverse events we included two RCTs and five observational (non-randomised) studies of five to eight weeks' duration with a total of 249 participants. All participants met the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) criteria for SAD. The average age ranged from 34 to 42 years, and the majority of participants were female (66% to 100%). Results from one trial with 68 participants showed that fluoxetine (20/36) was numerically superior to placebo (11/32) in achieving clinical response; however, the confidence interval (CI) included both a potential benefit as well as no benefit of fluoxetine (risk ratio (RR) 1.62, 95% CI 0.92 to 2.83, very low-certainty evidence). The number of adverse events was similar in both groups (very low-certainty evidence). Two trials involving a total of 136 participants compared fluoxetine versus light therapy. Meta-analysis showed fluoxetine and light therapy to be approximately equal in treating seasonal depression: RR of response 0.98 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.24, low-certainty evidence), RR of remission 0.81 (95% CI 0.39 to 1.71, very low-certainty evidence). The number of adverse events was similar in both groups (low-certainty evidence). We did not identify any eligible study comparing SGA with another SGA or with psychotherapy. Two RCTs and five non-randomised studies reported adverse event data on a total of 249 participants who received bupropion, fluoxetine, escitalopram, duloxetine, nefazodone, reboxetine, light therapy, or placebo. We were only able to obtain crude rates of adverse events, therefore caution is advised regarding interpretation of this information. Between 0% and 100% of participants who received an SGA suffered an adverse event, and between 0% and 25% of participants withdrew from the study due to adverse events. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Evidence for the effectiveness of SGAs is limited to one small trial of fluoxetine compared with placebo showing a non-significant effect in favour of fluoxetine, and two small trials comparing fluoxetine against light therapy suggesting equivalence between the two interventions. The lack of available evidence precluded us from drawing any overall conclusions on the use of SGAs for SAD. Further, larger RCTs are required to expand and strengthen the evidence base on this topic, and should also include comparisons with psychotherapy and other SGAs. Data on adverse events were sparse, and a comparative analysis was not possible. The data we obtained on adverse events is therefore not robust, and our confidence in the data is limited. Overall, up to 25% of participants treated with SGAs for SAD withdrew from the study early due to adverse events.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos de Segunda Generación/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Afectivo Estacional/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Antidepresivos de Segunda Generación/efectos adversos , Sesgo , Citalopram/efectos adversos , Citalopram/uso terapéutico , Clorhidrato de Duloxetina/efectos adversos , Clorhidrato de Duloxetina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Fluoxetina/efectos adversos , Fluoxetina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Morfolinas/efectos adversos , Morfolinas/uso terapéutico , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Fototerapia , Placebos/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Reboxetina/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Afectivo Estacional/terapia , Tiofenos/efectos adversos , Tiofenos/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Trials ; 20(1): 34, 2019 Jan 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30626424

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common psychiatric disorder. With systematic antidepressant treatment, 50-75% of patients have a treatment response but require 4-6 weeks to have their symptoms alleviated. Therefore, researchers anticipate the development of novel fast-acting antidepressants. Previous studies have revealed that the decrease of bio-energetic metabolism may contribute to the occurrence of depression, while our team has found adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and phosphocreatine (PCr) to be fast-acting antidepressants in the depressed-animal model. ATP and PCr have already been widely prescribed clinically as energy supplements for cells. This will be the first clinical attempt of the intravenous administration of ATP and PCr combined with orally administered fluoxetine in MDD. METHODS: This is a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. A total of 42 patients will be divided randomly into three groups. Patients will receive an intravenous administration of ATP or PCr or saline twice daily combined with orally administered fluoxetine (20 mg/day) for the first 2 weeks and fluoxetine monotherapy for the following 4 weeks. Follow-up assessment will be completed at week 10. Feasibility outcomes will include percentages of patient eligibility, intention to use medication, willingness to participate, drug adherence, completion of the scheduled assessment, retention, drop-out, etc. Physical examination results, Side Effect Rating Scale, adverse events, results from blood tests, electroencephalogram, and electrocardiograph will be recorded for safety evaluation of the augmentation therapy. The trends of efficacy will be evaluated by the reduction rate of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the mean change of the Clinical Global Impression Scale, and the Patients Health Questionaire-9 items. DISCUSSION: In our study, ATP and PCr will be given by intravenous infusion. Thus patients will be hospitalized for the initial 2 weeks for safety concern. Hospitalization will be an impact factor for the recruitment, participation, drop-out, efficacy, results, etc. The evaluation of our feasibility outcomes, study setting, safety of augmentation therapy and possible efficacy trends among groups, will facilitate a full-scale trial design and sample size calculation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03138681 . Registered on 3 May 2017. First patient: 4 May 2017.


Asunto(s)
Adenosina Trifosfato/administración & dosificación , Afecto/efectos de los fármacos , Antidepresivos de Segunda Generación/administración & dosificación , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Fluoxetina/administración & dosificación , Fosfocreatina/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/administración & dosificación , Adenosina Trifosfato/efectos adversos , Administración Intravenosa , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Antidepresivos de Segunda Generación/efectos adversos , China , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Fluoxetina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuestionario de Salud del Paciente , Fosfocreatina/efectos adversos , Proyectos Piloto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
3.
Rev Colomb Psiquiatr (Engl Ed) ; 48(1): 58-65, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30651174

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Depression is the most common psychiatric morbidity in pregnancy, affecting more than 13% of pregnant women. Its diagnosis is based on the criteria established by the DSM-5 and the application of validated scales such as the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. However, there are still errors and shortcomings among healthcare professionals in the recognition, diagnosis and treatment of depression during pregnancy, with the resulting consequences and repercussions on the gestation itself or the foetus. OBJECTIVE: To present a review of depression in pregnancy, its risk factors, clinical characteristics, complications and treatment. METHODS: The PubMed and LILACS databases were used to search for manuscripts. Of the 223 articles found, 55 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The prevalence of depression in pregnancy in South America is approximately 29% and the most significant risk factors are sexual abuse, pregnancy at an early age and intrafamily violence. Therefore, early diagnosis favours a reduction in risk behaviour, foetal neurodevelopmental disorders and obstetric outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Depression in pregnancy is common condition but is underreported as its symptoms are often attributed to the pregnancy itself. The use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants, particularly fluoxetine, which has not been associated with teratogenicity, is recommended, in addition to the implementation of non-pharmacological treatment such as psychotherapy, mindfulness and aerobic exercise. Educating healthcare professionals will facilitate the correct diagnosis and treatment of this condition.


Asunto(s)
Depresión/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/psicología , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/terapia , Femenino , Fluoxetina/efectos adversos , Fluoxetina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/terapia , Prevalencia , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Factores de Riesgo , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/efectos adversos
4.
Trials ; 19(1): 434, 2018 Aug 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30097056

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are amongst the most prescribed antidepressants for adolescents with depressive symptoms and major depressive disorder. However, SSRIs have significant shortcomings as a first-line treatment considering that not all patients respond to these antidepressants. Amongst paediatric populations, meta-analyses indicate that up to approximately 40% of patients do not respond, and for those who do show benefit, there is substantial heterogeneity in response onset. The neurotransmitter serotonin (5-HT) plays a role in the clinical effectiveness and mechanisms of action of SSRIs. However, the exact and complete mechanism of action and reasons for the low response rate to SSRIs in some adolescent populations remains unknown. METHODS: To examine SSRI response and the role of 5-HT, this study will employ a randomised double-blind within subject, repeated measures design, recruiting adolescent patients with major depressive disorder. Participants will be subjected to acute tryptophan depletion (ATD) and the balanced control condition on two separate study days within a first study phase (Phase A), and the order in which these conditions (ATD/balanced control condition) occur will be random. This phase will be followed by Phase B, where participants will receive open label pharmacological treatment as usual with the SSRI fluoxetine and followed-up over a 12-week period. DISCUSSION: ATD is a neurodietary method typically used to investigate the impact of lowered brain 5-HT synthesis on mood and behaviour. The major hypothesis of this study is that ATD will be negatively associated with mood and cognitive functioning, therefore reflecting individual serotonergic sensitivity and related depressive symptoms. Additionally, we expect the aforementioned effects of ATD administration on mood to predict clinical improvement with regard to overall depressive symptomatology 12 weeks into SSRI treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12616001561471 . Registered on 11 November 2016.


Asunto(s)
Conducta del Adolescente/efectos de los fármacos , Afecto/efectos de los fármacos , Aminoácidos/administración & dosificación , Antidepresivos de Segunda Generación/uso terapéutico , Encéfalo/efectos de los fármacos , Conducta Infantil/efectos de los fármacos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/dietoterapia , Suplementos Dietéticos , Fluoxetina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Serotonina/metabolismo , Triptófano/deficiencia , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Aminoácidos/efectos adversos , Antidepresivos de Segunda Generación/efectos adversos , Encéfalo/metabolismo , Niño , Terapia Combinada , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/metabolismo , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Suplementos Dietéticos/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Fluoxetina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Australia Occidental
5.
Biomed Pharmacother ; 98: 446-453, 2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29278855

RESUMEN

Olive oil and leaf extract have several health benefits; however, their beneficial effect against fluoxetine-induced liver injury has not been investigated. The present study aimed to scrutinize the impact of fluoxetine on the liver of rats and to evaluate the protective effects of olive oil and leaf extract. Rats received fluoxetine orally at dose of 10 mg/kg body weight for 7 consecutive days. The fluoxetine-induced rats were concurrently treated with olive oil or leaf extract. At the end of the experiment, blood and liver samples were collected for analysis. Fluoxetine administration significantly increased circulating ALT, AST, ALP and the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-1ß levels in rats. Histological analysis showed several alterations, such as inflammatory cells infiltration, hepatocyte vacuolation and dilated sinusoids in the liver of fluoxetine-induced rats. Concurrent supplementation of olive oil and olive leaf extract significantly reduced circulating liver function marker enzymes and pro-inflammatory cytokines, and prevented fluoxetine-induced histological alterations. Both olive oil and leaf extract significantly decreased liver lipid peroxidation and nitric oxide, and ameliorated liver glutathione, superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione peroxidase. In addition, olive oil and leaf extract prevented fluoxetine-induced apoptosis in the liver of rats as evidenced by decreased expression of Bax and caspase-3, and up-regulated expression of Bcl-2. In conclusion, olive oil and leaf extract protect against fluoxetine-induced liver injury in rats through attenuation of oxidative stress, inflammation and apoptosis.


Asunto(s)
Apoptosis/efectos de los fármacos , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/tratamiento farmacológico , Inflamación/tratamiento farmacológico , Aceite de Oliva/farmacología , Estrés Oxidativo/efectos de los fármacos , Extractos Vegetales/farmacología , Hojas de la Planta/química , Alanina Transaminasa/metabolismo , Animales , Antioxidantes/metabolismo , Aspartato Aminotransferasas/metabolismo , Catalasa/metabolismo , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/metabolismo , Citocinas/metabolismo , Fluoxetina/efectos adversos , Glutatión/metabolismo , Glutatión Peroxidasa/metabolismo , Hepatocitos/metabolismo , Inflamación/metabolismo , Peroxidación de Lípido/efectos de los fármacos , Hígado/efectos de los fármacos , Hígado/metabolismo , Ratas , Superóxido Dismutasa/metabolismo
6.
Braz J Med Biol Res ; 50(10): e6161, 2017 Aug 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28832762

RESUMEN

This study aimed to investigate the antidepressant effect and the mechanism of action of Kai-Xin-San (KXS) in fluoxetine-resistant depressive (FRD) rats. Two hundred male Wistar rats weighing 200±10 g were exposed to chronic and unpredictable mild stresses (CUMS) for 4 weeks and given fluoxetine treatment simultaneously. The rats that did not show significant improvement in behavioral indexes were chosen as the FRD model rats. These rats were randomly divided into four groups: FRD model control; oral fluoxetine and aspirin; oral KXS at a dose of 338 mg·kg-1·day-1; and oral KXS at a dose of 676 mg·kg-1·day-1. Rats continued to be exposed to CUMS and underwent treatment once a day for 3 weeks, then cytokine (COX-2, IFN-γ, IL-1ß, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, TGF-ß, and TNF-α) levels in the hippocampus and serum, and organ coefficients were measured. Both doses of KXS improved the crossing and rearing frequencies, sucrose-preference index, and body weight in FRD rats. KXS at a dose of 338 mg·kg-1·day-1reduced COX-2, IL-2, IL-6, TNF-α levels, increased IL-10 level in the hippocampus, and reduced IL-2 and TNF-α levels in serum. KXS at a dose of 676 mg·kg-1·day-1reduced TNF-α level in the hippocampus, reduced IL-2 and TNF-α levels in serum, and increased IFN-γ and IL-10 levels in the hippocampus and serum. There were no significant differences in organ-coefficients of the spleen among and between groups. The results suggested that oral administration of KXS in FRD rats was effective in improving behavior disorders by influencing various inflammatory pathways.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Citocinas/metabolismo , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos/uso terapéutico , Hipocampo/metabolismo , Animales , Citocinas/efectos de los fármacos , Depresión/metabolismo , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Fluoxetina/efectos adversos , Hipocampo/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Distribución Aleatoria , Ratas , Ratas Wistar , Estrés Psicológico/psicología
7.
Can J Anaesth ; 64(9): 940-946, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28667541

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Perioperative use of serotonergic agents increases the risk of serotonin syndrome. We describe the occurrence of serotonin syndrome after fentanyl use in two patients taking multiple serotonergic agents. CLINICAL FEATURES: Two patients who had been taking multiple serotonergic medications or herbal supplements (one patient taking fluoxetine, turmeric supplement, and acyclovir; the other taking fluoxetine and trazodone) developed serotonin syndrome perioperatively when undergoing outpatient procedures. Both experienced acute loss of consciousness and generalized myoclonus after receiving fentanyl. In one patient, the serotonin syndrome promptly resolved after naloxone administration. In the other patient, the onset of serotonin syndrome was delayed and manifested after discharge, most likely attributed to the intraoperative use of midazolam for sedation. CONCLUSION: Even small doses of fentanyl administered to patients taking multiple serotonergic medications and herbal supplements may trigger serotonin syndrome. Prompt reversal of serotonin toxicity in one patient by naloxone illustrates the likely opioid-mediated pathogenesis of serotonin syndrome in this case. It also highlights that taking serotonergic agents concomitantly can produce the compounding effect that causes serotonin syndrome. The delayed presentation of serotonin syndrome in the patient who received a large dose of midazolam suggests that outpatients taking multiple serotonergic drugs who receive benzodiazepines may require longer postprocedural monitoring.


Asunto(s)
Suplementos Dietéticos/efectos adversos , Serotoninérgicos/efectos adversos , Síndrome de la Serotonina/inducido químicamente , Anciano , Curcuma/efectos adversos , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Fentanilo/efectos adversos , Fluoxetina/administración & dosificación , Fluoxetina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Midazolam/administración & dosificación , Midazolam/efectos adversos , Naloxona/uso terapéutico , Periodo Perioperatorio , Serotoninérgicos/administración & dosificación , Síndrome de la Serotonina/fisiopatología , Factores de Tiempo , Trazodona/administración & dosificación , Trazodona/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven
9.
Brain Res ; 1662: 110-115, 2017 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28193480

RESUMEN

Increased alcohol consumption and heightened aggression have been linked to social isolation. Furthermore, animals treated with alcohol following social separation showed higher aggression together with lower serotonin transmission. Although reduced serotonin transmission in the brain may be related to alcohol-induced heightened aggression and fluoxetine has been used to reduce alcohol intake and aggression, it remains unclear whether there are specific brain regions where changes in serotonin transmission are critical for animal aggression following the alcohol treatment. In the present study, we isolated mice for 4-6weeks and injected them with alcohol, fluoxetine and alcohol with fluoxetine. We studied their aggression by using two types of behavioral paradigms: isolation-induced attack behavior towards a naïve mouse in a neutral cage, or shock-induced target biting aggression. We observed that alcohol administered at 500mg/kg significantly increased animal attack behaviors towards naïve mice 30min after injections. This dose of alcohol co-administered with a low dose of fluoxetine (2mg/kg) further increased the attack behaviors, but with higher doses of fluoxetine, the attack behaviors were decreased. Alcohol administered at a dose of 1,000mg/kg significantly decreased the shock-induced target biting rates 24h after injections. Interestingly, 24h after injections, we observed a significant increase in target biting rates when alcohol was co-administered with fluoxetine at a dose of 16mg/kg. We also observed the same heightened target biting rates when animals were injected with fluoxetine alone. This heightened biting attack engendered by the fluoxetine (alone or in combination with the alcohol) occurred at a time when brain serotonin activity was reduced by these drugs in the frontal cortex and hypothalamus. These observations, in concordance with previous findings reported by others, indicate that heightened biting attack behavior may be associated with reduced serotonergic activity in brain regions regulating aggression.


Asunto(s)
Agresión/efectos de los fármacos , Etanol/efectos adversos , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/psicología , Animales , Conducta Animal/efectos de los fármacos , Encéfalo/efectos de los fármacos , Etanol/farmacología , Fluoxetina/efectos adversos , Fluoxetina/farmacología , Lóbulo Frontal/efectos de los fármacos , Hipotálamo/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Ratones , Serotonina
10.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 50(10): e6161, 2017. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-888938

RESUMEN

This study aimed to investigate the antidepressant effect and the mechanism of action of Kai-Xin-San (KXS) in fluoxetine-resistant depressive (FRD) rats. Two hundred male Wistar rats weighing 200±10 g were exposed to chronic and unpredictable mild stresses (CUMS) for 4 weeks and given fluoxetine treatment simultaneously. The rats that did not show significant improvement in behavioral indexes were chosen as the FRD model rats. These rats were randomly divided into four groups: FRD model control; oral fluoxetine and aspirin; oral KXS at a dose of 338 mg·kg-1·day-1; and oral KXS at a dose of 676 mg·kg-1·day-1. Rats continued to be exposed to CUMS and underwent treatment once a day for 3 weeks, then cytokine (COX-2, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, TGF-β, and TNF-α) levels in the hippocampus and serum, and organ coefficients were measured. Both doses of KXS improved the crossing and rearing frequencies, sucrose-preference index, and body weight in FRD rats. KXS at a dose of 338 mg·kg-1·day-1reduced COX-2, IL-2, IL-6, TNF-α levels, increased IL-10 level in the hippocampus, and reduced IL-2 and TNF-α levels in serum. KXS at a dose of 676 mg·kg-1·day-1reduced TNF-α level in the hippocampus, reduced IL-2 and TNF-α levels in serum, and increased IFN-γ and IL-10 levels in the hippocampus and serum. There were no significant differences in organ-coefficients of the spleen among and between groups. The results suggested that oral administration of KXS in FRD rats was effective in improving behavior disorders by influencing various inflammatory pathways.


Asunto(s)
Animales , Masculino , Ratas , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Citocinas/metabolismo , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos/uso terapéutico , Hipocampo/metabolismo , Citocinas/efectos de los fármacos , Depresión/metabolismo , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Fluoxetina/efectos adversos , Hipocampo/efectos de los fármacos , Distribución Aleatoria , Ratas Wistar , Estrés Psicológico/psicología
11.
Nature ; 537(7618): 97-101, 2016 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27556938

RESUMEN

Serotonin (also known as 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)) is a neurotransmitter that has an essential role in the regulation of emotion. However, the precise circuits have not yet been defined through which aversive states are orchestrated by 5-HT. Here we show that 5-HT from the dorsal raphe nucleus (5-HTDRN) enhances fear and anxiety and activates a subpopulation of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) neurons in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (CRFBNST) in mice. Specifically, 5-HTDRN projections to the BNST, via actions at 5-HT2C receptors (5-HT2CRs), engage a CRFBNST inhibitory microcircuit that silences anxiolytic BNST outputs to the ventral tegmental area and lateral hypothalamus. Furthermore, we demonstrate that this CRFBNST inhibitory circuit underlies aversive behaviour following acute exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). This early aversive effect is mediated via the corticotrophin-releasing factor type 1 receptor (CRF1R, also known as CRHR1), given that CRF1R antagonism is sufficient to prevent acute SSRI-induced enhancements in aversive learning. These results reveal an essential 5-HTDRN→CRFBNST circuit governing fear and anxiety, and provide a potential mechanistic explanation for the clinical observation of early adverse events to SSRI treatment in some patients with anxiety disorders.


Asunto(s)
Amígdala del Cerebelo/metabolismo , Ansiedad/metabolismo , Hormona Liberadora de Corticotropina/metabolismo , Miedo/fisiología , Serotonina/metabolismo , Tálamo/metabolismo , Amígdala del Cerebelo/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Ansiedad/inducido químicamente , Trastornos de Ansiedad/inducido químicamente , Núcleo Dorsal del Rafe/efectos de los fármacos , Núcleo Dorsal del Rafe/metabolismo , Miedo/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Fluoxetina/efectos adversos , Fluoxetina/farmacología , Hipotálamo/efectos de los fármacos , Hipotálamo/metabolismo , Masculino , Ratones , Neuronas/efectos de los fármacos , Neuronas/metabolismo , Optogenética , Receptores de Hormona Liberadora de Corticotropina/metabolismo , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/efectos adversos , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/farmacología , Tálamo/efectos de los fármacos , Área Tegmental Ventral/efectos de los fármacos , Área Tegmental Ventral/metabolismo
12.
Complement Ther Med ; 23(5): 674-84, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26365447

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) versus fluoxetine on depression. DESIGN: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: RCT with two parallel groups that compared CHM and fluoxetine on treatment of depression with reported decreased Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) and adverse events during treatment were included after searching through six electric-databases. The methodological quality of RCTs was assessed according to the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software with pooled mean difference (MD) or risk ratio (RR) and their 95% confidence interval (CI) if no significant heterogeneity was detected. A SOF table was generated using GRADEPro software to evaluate the overall quality of the evidence. RESULTS: Twenty-six trials with 3294 participants were included in the review. Most of them had high risk of bias during conducting and reporting. The results achieved weak evidence which showed CHM had similar effect to fluoxetine (20mg/day) on relieving depression according to HAMD assessment (for primary depression: MD=-0.08, 95%CI -0.98-0.82; for secondary depression: MD=-0.36, 95%CI -1.55-0.83), but fewer incidences of adverse events than the drug (for primary depression: RR=0.31, 95%CI 0.17-0.59; for post-stroke depression: RR=0.04, 95%CI 0.00-0.25). No serious adverse event was found in neither CHM nor fluoxetine group. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the poor quality of included trials and the potential publication bias of this review, no confirmed conclusion could be draw to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of CHM for depression compared with fluoxetine.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos/uso terapéutico , Fluoxetina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antidepresivos/efectos adversos , Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Fluoxetina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Adulto Joven
13.
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol ; 42(7): 747-51, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25988866

RESUMEN

Herbal medicines are perceived to be safe by the general public and medical practitioners, despite abundant evidence from clinical trials and case reports that show herbal preparations can have significant adverse effects. The overall impact of adverse events to herbal medicines in Australia is currently unknown. Post marketing surveillance of medications through spontaneous adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) is one way to estimate this risk. The patterns of spontaneously reported ADRs provide insight to herbal dangers, especially when compared with patterns of a mechanistically similar conventional drug. The study compared the pattern of spontaneously reported ADRs to St. John's Wort (Hypericum perforatum), a common herbal treatment for depression which contains selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI), to fluoxetine, a commonly prescribed synthetic SSRI antidepressant. Spontaneous ADR reports sent to the TGA between 2000-2013 for St. John's Wort (n = 84) and fluoxetine (n = 447) were obtained and analysed. The demographic information, types of interaction, severity of the ADR, and the body systems affected (using the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system) were recorded for individual ADR cases. The majority of spontaneously reported ADRs for St. John's Wort and fluoxetine were concerning females aged 26-50 years (28.6%, 22.8%). The organ systems affected by ADRs to St John's Wort and fluoxetine have a similar profile, with the majority of cases affecting the central nervous system (45.2%, 61.7%). This result demonstrates that herbal preparations can result in ADRs similar to those of prescription medications.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Fluoxetina/efectos adversos , Hypericum/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Preparaciones de Plantas/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven
14.
J Affect Disord ; 166: 6-13, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25012404

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder is a common psychiatric illness with reported prevalence rates of 12-16% in persons aged 12 and over. Depression is also associated with a high risk of new onset of type 2 diabetes (T2D). This relationship between depression and diabetes may be related to depression itself and/or drugs prescribed. Importantly, the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), the most commonly prescribed class of antidepressants, increases the risk of developing T2D. However, the mechanism(s) underlying this association remains elusive. METHODS: Here we examine the effects of the SSRI fluoxetine (Prozac®) on beta cell function utilizing INS-1E cells, a rat beta cell line, to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms. RESULTS: Fluoxetine treatment significantly reduced glucose stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS). This decreased beta cell function was concomitant with an increased production of reactive oxygen species and oxidative damage which may contribute to decreased mitochondrial electron transport chain enzyme (ETC) activity. Importantly the fluoxetine-induced deficits in beta cell function were prevented by the addition of the antioxidant folic acid. LIMITATIONS: These studies were conducted in vitro; the in vivo relevance remains to be determined. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that use of SSRI antidepressants may increase the risk of new-onset T2D by causing oxidative stress in pancreatic beta cells. However, folic acid supplementation in patients taking SSRIs may reduce the risk of new onset diabetes via protection of normal beta cell function.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Fluoxetina/efectos adversos , Células Secretoras de Insulina/efectos de los fármacos , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/efectos adversos , Animales , Línea Celular , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/fisiopatología , Femenino , Fluoxetina/uso terapéutico , Ácido Fólico/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Células Secretoras de Insulina/metabolismo , Masculino , Ratas , Especies Reactivas de Oxígeno/metabolismo , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico
15.
Genet Mol Res ; 13(1): 578-89, 2014 Jan 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24615023

RESUMEN

Fluoxetine, commonly known as Prozac, is the first representative of the so-called new generation of antidepressants that promise efficacy, with few side effects, against deep depression, nervous bulimia, and anxiety. As there is a growing number of people suffering from anxiety and depression; consequently, the use of fluoxetine is also increasing. Verifying absence of drug effects such as cytotoxicity or mutagenicity is of great importance. Certain vitamins, such as vitamin A (retinol, retinoids) and vitamin C (ascorbic acid) protect and are extremely active against mutagens. We evaluated the cytotoxic and mutagenic activity of fluoxetine, with and without concomitant administration of vitamin A or C, in Allium cepa meristem cells and Wistar rat bone marrow cells. The A. cepa meristem cells showed fluoxetine cytotoxicity; concomitant treatment with vitamin A or C proved non-protective. Treatment of Wistar rats with fluoxetine intraperitoneally or via gavage did not affect cell division or cause clastogenic effects. Vitamin A and C did not affect the cytotoxicity or mutagenicity of fluoxetine in the rat cells.


Asunto(s)
Fluoxetina/administración & dosificación , Mutágenos/administración & dosificación , Cebollas/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Ácido Ascórbico/administración & dosificación , División Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Combinación de Medicamentos , Fluoxetina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Pruebas de Mutagenicidad , Mutágenos/efectos adversos , Cebollas/genética , Ratas , Vitamina A/administración & dosificación
16.
PLoS One ; 9(3): e88917, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24598761

RESUMEN

A significant number of children undergo maternal exposure to antidepressants and they often present low birth weight. Therefore, it is important to understand how selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) affect the development of the hypothalamus, the key center for metabolism regulation. In this study we investigated the proliferative actions of fluoxetine in fetal hypothalamic neuroprogenitor cells and demonstrate that fluoxetine induces the proliferation of these cells, as shown by increased neurospheres size and number of proliferative cells (Ki-67+ cells). Moreover, fluoxetine inhibits the differentiation of hypothalamic neuroprogenitor cells, as demonstrated by decreased number of mature neurons (Neu-N+ cells) and increased number of undifferentiated cells (SOX-2+ cells). Additionally, fluoxetine-induced proliferation and maintenance of hypothalamic neuroprogenitor cells leads to changes in the mRNA levels of appetite regulator neuropeptides, including Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and Cocaine-and-Amphetamine-Regulated-Transcript (CART). This study provides the first evidence that SSRIs affect the development of hypothalamic neuroprogenitor cells in vitro with consequent alterations on appetite neuropeptides.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos de Segunda Generación/farmacología , Fluoxetina/farmacología , Hipotálamo/citología , Células-Madre Neurales/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Antidepresivos de Segunda Generación/efectos adversos , Diferenciación Celular , Proliferación Celular , Células Cultivadas , Femenino , Fluoxetina/efectos adversos , Expresión Génica/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Hipotálamo/efectos de los fármacos , Proteínas del Tejido Nervioso/genética , Proteínas del Tejido Nervioso/metabolismo , Células-Madre Neurales/metabolismo , Neuropéptido Y/genética , Neuropéptido Y/metabolismo , Embarazo , Proopiomelanocortina/genética , Proopiomelanocortina/metabolismo , Ratas , Neuronas Serotoninérgicas/efectos de los fármacos , Neuronas Serotoninérgicas/metabolismo , Esferoides Celulares/efectos de los fármacos
17.
J Affect Disord ; 155: 216-22, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24289892

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: A significant correlation exists between coronary artery diseases and depression. The aim of this trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of saffron versus fluoxetine in improving depressive symptoms of patients who were suffering from depression after performing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: In this randomized double-blind parallel-group study, 40 patients with a diagnosis of mild to moderate depression who had undergone PCI in the last six months were randomized to receive either fluoexetine (40mg/day) or saffron (30mg/day) capsule for six weeks. Participants were evaluated by Hamilton depression rating scale (HDRS) at weeks 3 and 6 and the adverse events were systemically recorded. RESULTS: By the study endpoint, no significant difference was detected between two groups in reduction of HDRS scores (P=0.62). Remission and response rates were not significantly different as well (P=1.00 and P=0.67; respectively). There was no significant difference between two groups in the frequency of adverse events during this trial. LIMITATIONS: Relatively small sample size and short observational period were the major limitations of this study. CONCLUSION: Short-term therapy with saffron capsules showed the same antidepressant efficacy compared with fluoxetine in patients with a prior history of PCI who were suffering from depression.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Crocus , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Fluoxetina/uso terapéutico , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/estadística & datos numéricos , Fitoterapia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Antidepresivos/efectos adversos , Crocus/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Fluoxetina/efectos adversos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fitoterapia/efectos adversos , Extractos Vegetales/efectos adversos , Extractos Vegetales/uso terapéutico , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
Trials ; 14: 105, 2013 Apr 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23782520

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The perimenopausal period refers to the interval when women's menstrual cycles become irregular and is characterized by an increased risk of depressive symptoms. Use of homeopathy to treat depression is widespread but there is a lack of clinical trials about its efficacy in depression in peri- and postmenopausal women. Previous trials suggest that individualized homeopathic treatments improve depression. In classical homeopathy, an individually selected homeopathic remedy is prescribed after a complete case history of the patient. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of the homeopathic individualized treatment versus placebo or fluoxetine in peri- and postmenopausal women with moderate to severe depression. METHODS/DESIGN: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, three-arm trial with a six-week follow-up study was designed. The study will be conducted in a public research hospital in Mexico City (Juárez de México Hospital) in the outpatient service of homeopathy. One hundred eighty nine peri- and postmenopausal women diagnosed with major depression according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (moderate to severe intensity) will be included. The primary outcome is change in the mean total score among groups on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression after the fourth and sixth week of treatment. Secondary outcomes are: Beck Depression Inventory change in mean score, Greene's Scale change in mean score, response and remission rates and safety. Efficacy data will be analyzed in the intention-to-treat population. To determine differences in the primary and secondary outcomes among groups at baseline and weeks four and six, data will be analyzed by analysis of variance for independent measures with the Bonferroni post-hoc test. DISCUSSION: This study is the first trial of classical homeopathy that will evaluate the efficacy of homeopathic individualized treatment using C-potencies versus placebo or fluoxetine in peri- and postmenopausal women with moderate to severe depression. It is an attempt to deal with the obstacles of homeopathic research due to the need for individual prescriptions in one of the most common psychiatric diseases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01635218.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos de Segunda Generación/uso terapéutico , Depresión/terapia , Fluoxetina/uso terapéutico , Materia Medica/uso terapéutico , Perimenopausia/psicología , Posmenopausia/psicología , Proyectos de Investigación , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Análisis de Varianza , Antidepresivos de Segunda Generación/efectos adversos , Protocolos Clínicos , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Depresión/psicología , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Fluoxetina/efectos adversos , Hospitales Públicos , Humanos , Materia Medica/efectos adversos , México , Medicina de Precisión , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/efectos adversos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
PLoS One ; 8(1): e55053, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23383055

RESUMEN

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine (FLU, Prozac®) is commonly prescribed for depression in pregnant women. This results in SSRI exposure of the developing fetus. However, there are knowledge gaps regarding the impact of SSRI exposure during development. Given the role of serotonin in brain development and its cross-talk with sex hormone function, we investigated effects of developmental exposure to pharmacologically relevant concentrations of FLU (3 and 30 nM (measured)) on brain neurotransmitter levels, gonadal differentiation, aromatase activity in brain and gonads, and the thyroid system, using the Xenopus tropicalis model. Tadpoles were chronically exposed (8 weeks) until metamorphosis. At metamorphosis brains were cryosectioned and levels of serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and their metabolites 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, and homovanillic acid were measured in discrete regions (telencephalon, hypothalamus and the reticular formation) of the cryosections using high-performance liquid chromatography. Exposure to 30 nM FLU increased the concentration of 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid in hypothalamus compared with controls. FLU exposure did not affect survival, time to metamorphosis, thyroid histology, gonadal sex differentiation, or aromatase activity implying that the effect on the serotonergic neurotransmitter system in the hypothalamus region was specific. The FLU concentration that impacted the serotonin system is lower than the concentration measured in umbilical cord serum, suggesting that the serotonin system of the developing brain is highly sensitive to in utero exposure to FLU. To our knowledge this is the first study showing effects of developmental FLU exposure on brain neurochemistry. Given that SSRIs are present in the aquatic environment the current results warrant further investigation into the neurobehavioral effects of SSRIs in aquatic wildlife.


Asunto(s)
Fluoxetina/efectos adversos , Hipotálamo/efectos de los fármacos , Hipotálamo/crecimiento & desarrollo , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/efectos adversos , Serotonina/metabolismo , Animales , Aromatasa/metabolismo , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Hipotálamo/metabolismo , Larva/efectos de los fármacos , Larva/crecimiento & desarrollo , Larva/metabolismo , Masculino , Exposición Materna/efectos adversos , Metamorfosis Biológica/efectos de los fármacos , Neurotransmisores/metabolismo , Reproducción/efectos de los fármacos , Diferenciación Sexual/efectos de los fármacos , Razón de Masculinidad , Glándula Tiroides/efectos de los fármacos , Glándula Tiroides/crecimiento & desarrollo , Glándula Tiroides/metabolismo , Tirotropina/metabolismo , Calidad del Agua , Xenopus
20.
Hum Psychopharmacol ; 28(1): 54-60, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23280545

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Saffron (Crocus sativus L.) has shown beneficial aphrodisiac effects in some animal and human studies. The aim of the present study was to assess the safety and efficacy of saffron on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-induced sexual dysfunction in women. METHODS: This was a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Thirty-eight women with major depression who were stabilized on fluoxetine 40 mg/day for a minimum of 6 weeks and had experienced subjective feeling of sexual dysfunction entered the study. The patients were randomly assigned to saffron (30 mg/daily) or placebo for 4 weeks. Measurement was performed at baseline, week 2, and week 4 using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Side effects were systematically recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-four women had at least one post-baseline measurement and completed the study. Two-factor repeated measure analysis of variance showed significant effect of time × treatment interaction [Greenhouse-Geisser's corrected: F(1.580, 50.567) = 5.366, p = 0.012] and treatment for FSFI total score [F(1, 32) = 4.243, p = 0.048]. At the end of the fourth week, patients in the saffron group had experienced significantly more improvement in total FSFI (p < 0.001), arousal (p = 0.028), lubrication (p = 0.035), and pain (p = 0.016) domains of FSFI but not in desire (p = 0.196), satisfaction (p = 0.206), and orgasm (p = 0.354) domains. Frequency of side effects was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: It seems saffron may safely and effectively improve some of the fluoxetine-induced sexual problems including arousal, lubrication, and pain.


Asunto(s)
Crocus , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Fluoxetina/efectos adversos , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/efectos adversos , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas/inducido químicamente , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Extractos Vegetales/uso terapéutico , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA